Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:01.582 --> 00:00:04.107
Welcome to the Dear Menopause podcast.
00:00:04.107 --> 00:00:06.772
I'm Sona Lovell, your host Now.
00:00:06.772 --> 00:00:11.929
I've been bringing you conversations with amazing menopause experts for over two years now.
00:00:11.929 --> 00:00:21.128
If you have missed any of those conversations, now's the time to go back and listen, and you can always share them with anyone you think needs to hear them.
00:00:21.128 --> 00:00:25.701
This way, more people can find these amazing conversations, needs to hear them.
00:00:25.701 --> 00:00:26.943
This way, more people can find these amazing conversations.
00:00:26.943 --> 00:00:40.942
Hi, I am here today with a woman that I cannot wait for you all to meet the wonderful, incredible human that is Joanna Wicks.
00:00:40.942 --> 00:00:41.545
Hey Jo, hi Sonia, how are you?
00:00:41.545 --> 00:00:47.929
This is hilarious, jo and I talk on a regular basis and all of a sudden, we've got the formality of being on camera and with a mic, and so it's all got all kind of formal.
00:00:47.929 --> 00:00:49.314
Don't worry, we'll warm into it.
00:00:49.314 --> 00:00:51.240
Jo, let's start off.
00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:54.551
Tell everybody a little bit about who you actually are.
00:00:55.673 --> 00:00:59.521
Well, my name is Johanna Wicks and I'm a women's health advocate.
00:00:59.521 --> 00:01:16.692
I'm also someone who is living through perimenopause I'm 47 and started to go through perimenopause at 42, but, like so many of us, had a very long and painful journey to get that diagnosis, which has helped fuel my advocacy.
00:01:17.780 --> 00:01:18.743
Yeah, and fuel it.
00:01:18.743 --> 00:01:19.861
It did Okay.
00:01:19.861 --> 00:01:25.573
So tell us a little bit then about how did you know, at 42, that you were going into perimenopause.
00:01:26.981 --> 00:01:30.772
Well, I didn't, which is one of the things that I think has really shocked me.
00:01:30.772 --> 00:01:32.879
So I started to not feel like myself.
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:37.992
I had a lot of symptoms which I had no idea was anything to do with perimenopause.
00:01:37.992 --> 00:01:42.510
And in fact, the caveat is I had worked in sexual and reproductive health for 15 years.
00:01:42.510 --> 00:01:43.926
I knew a lot about women's health.
00:01:43.926 --> 00:01:49.121
I knew a lot about women's health, I knew a lot about women's bodies, but it turns out that knowledge only went up to pregnancy and fertility.
00:01:49.121 --> 00:01:57.405
I didn't actually know anything about what happens to women after that kind of fertile phase starts to come to an end.
00:01:57.626 --> 00:01:59.310
So you know, I kept going to the GP.
00:01:59.310 --> 00:02:13.044
I had muscular aches and pains, I thought I had arthritis, like so many of us, I thought I had dementia, I had chronic headaches, but mostly I had a lot of rage, which was really debilitating in terms of my family and my relationships.
00:02:13.044 --> 00:02:21.567
And this went on for two years of just constant appointments, constant tests, ct scans, ultrasounds.
00:02:21.567 --> 00:02:30.390
And it wasn't until I read Dr Ginny Mansberg's book, the M Word, that a light bulb went off and I actually then went and saw a women's health specialist.
00:02:30.780 --> 00:02:41.762
Well, thank goodness Dr Ginny wrote that book and you found it which is going to lead us into a really cool part of why I wanted to bring you on and introduce you to everyone today, jo.
00:02:42.103 --> 00:03:09.567
You took your whole experience and turned it into an incredible form of advocacy that has absolutely changed everything to do the whole landscape to do with menopause and perimenopause in Australia, and one of the things we're going to talk about is a whole lot of I'm going to call it the mechanics that have gone on in the background to get things like the Senate inquiry to get us to the point of the Senate inquiry.
00:03:09.567 --> 00:03:18.633
So the Senate inquiry kind of really put menopause into the conversation in the public, in the government, which was great.
00:03:18.633 --> 00:03:32.001
But what people don't know is that there has been an incredible amount of work that has gone on behind the scenes to even get us to that point of the Senate inquiry, and you, my dear, I believe, are 99% responsible for that.
00:03:32.001 --> 00:03:41.670
So let's talk about your history as an advocate in women's health and then lead us into how you came into this menopause space.
00:03:41.973 --> 00:03:46.224
That's a great question and talking about advocacy is my favorite topic in the whole wide world.
00:03:46.224 --> 00:03:48.669
Well, maybe menopause is not sure.
00:03:48.669 --> 00:04:03.007
So I've worked in advocacy for the last 15 years, as I mentioned, around especially around women's health and women's reproductive health and access to sexual and reproductive health and rights, and it's been very much a personal and professional passion.
00:04:03.007 --> 00:04:11.562
But that advocacy I've worked with a lot of not-for-profits around ensuring that women's health and women's reproductive health is on the policy agenda.
00:04:11.562 --> 00:04:19.771
So that's involved working with the government, you know, working in media, working with community groups to try and keep that conversation front and centre.
00:04:20.880 --> 00:04:35.324
So then, after I realised that I was in perimenopause and you know I had a lot of rage and disappointment that someone who is so knowledgeable about women's health could know nothing about this phase of life, and it really got me thinking.
00:04:35.324 --> 00:04:39.533
You know, why is it that women know so little about their midlife health?
00:04:39.533 --> 00:04:46.613
You know, why is it that someone as educated in women's health as myself had never heard the term perimenopause?
00:04:46.613 --> 00:04:49.309
And I started to do quite a lot of reading.
00:04:49.309 --> 00:04:56.067
I was looking at what was happening in the UK and there was this massive, you know, kind of community-led movement that was.
00:04:56.067 --> 00:04:59.463
You know women were demanding more and sort of.
00:04:59.463 --> 00:05:19.990
Simultaneously, whilst I was doing all this research, a friend in the reproductive health space reached out and told me that there was a pharmaceutical company that was wanting to talk to someone who knew something about menopause and advocacy to see what they could learn about in this space, so that took you on a whole new journey, didn't it?
00:05:20.380 --> 00:05:23.389
So you obviously went and had a conversation with that pharmaceutical company.
00:05:24.050 --> 00:05:25.362
Yes, and it was.
00:05:25.362 --> 00:05:34.031
I mean, it was a fantastic conversation because as I was chatting to them, I just realised all the things that you know could be, I guess, activated in Australia.
00:05:34.031 --> 00:05:37.689
So they had wanted to know what had been happening in the UK.
00:05:37.689 --> 00:05:46.550
They'd seen what was happening and they wanted to know why wasn't something similar happening in Australia and how would something like that, you know, grow in Australia?
00:05:47.432 --> 00:05:59.819
And as soon as I started talking and researching, it became apparent that there were so many opportunities to actually put perimenopause and menopause on the agenda in Australia, and so that initially started off with a consultancy.
00:05:59.819 --> 00:06:03.086
They were like well, how would this happen?
00:06:03.086 --> 00:06:06.934
How would you know a patient advocate go about starting this change?
00:06:06.934 --> 00:06:24.084
And I was able to draw on all my experience working in reproductive health and put together a map that you know outlined how you'd, you know, work with government, how you'd work with community and how you'd work with clinical professionals in the health sector, and you'd pull all three of those levers at once to get change.
00:06:24.084 --> 00:06:31.071
And, of course, after talking about this, I was pretty invested and I was really hoping that they'd say, oh, would you like to do this?
00:06:31.271 --> 00:06:32.451
And they did, and they did.
00:06:32.451 --> 00:06:34.153
Okay, so give us a timeline.
00:06:34.153 --> 00:06:36.797
What year was that first conversation that you had with them?
00:06:51.420 --> 00:06:52.543
So it was actually in April 2022.
00:06:52.543 --> 00:06:54.387
So just over two years ago and it was a really exciting time in the Australian landscape.
00:06:54.387 --> 00:07:04.524
So the piece of work that I did for the company in looking at the landscape actually was due right after the 2022 election, which I had deliberately said look, can I give you the outcomes of my research after that election, Because I knew that whatever happened in the election could really change the landscape.
00:07:04.524 --> 00:07:31.581
And what really excited me about the 2022 election was we now have a parliament with more women in it than ever before, and I actually mapped the age of everyone who was elected in the 2022 election and if you look at the women in the Australian parliament right now, a very large chunk of them are in the menopausal transition years and to me, I was like this is an opportunity for policy change, because this is a parliament that's going to understand this issue.
00:07:32.363 --> 00:07:36.473
Yeah, it was just like the perfect window of opportunity, wasn't it?
00:07:36.473 --> 00:07:46.422
I feel like it was this beautiful intersection of your passion and your experience and your lived experience with perimenopause and pharmaceutical company going.
00:07:46.422 --> 00:07:48.005
We want to make a change here.
00:07:48.005 --> 00:07:54.209
That's actually all about the patients having a better outcome, and I think that's something I'd really like to highlight in our conversation.
00:07:54.209 --> 00:08:04.011
You know, so often when we hear, particularly in the health industry, people talk about pharmaceutical companies, it's in this really kind of almost derogatory sense.
00:08:04.011 --> 00:08:05.524
You know, it's the dirty pharma.
00:08:05.524 --> 00:08:19.283
It's like, oh, you took money from pharma and look, there are instances where big pharma don't do good things, but that is so true, sonia, because I think it's been really interesting, having come from a not-for-profit background, to working.
00:08:19.663 --> 00:08:33.990
This was my first ever role in a for-profit company and I think it made me realise that, yeah, the biggest challenge I would have in putting perimenopause on the agenda was the perception that pharma is somehow dirty or negative, you know, when you unpack it.
00:08:34.130 --> 00:08:57.332
I can't imagine there's hardly a person in Australia that doesn't use a pharmaceutical product, and for me personally, the real light bulb moment was being, after two years of utter misery, of feeling terrible every day, when I saw the women's health specialist, I actually was prescribed menopause hormone therapy and within three weeks all those symptoms that had tormented me for two years disappeared.
00:08:57.332 --> 00:09:15.025
Now I understand this doesn't necessarily happen for everyone, but for me it was a real understanding of the power of replacing your hormones during this phase, and I was so grateful that there were pharmaceutical companies out there that were still manufacturing this product.
00:09:15.025 --> 00:09:22.009
Because, if we put it into the broader context, sonia, as you well know, after the Women's Health Initiative nobody was using menopause hormone therapy.
00:09:22.009 --> 00:09:30.567
A lot of pharmaceutical companies got out of the women's health space, stopped manufacturing these drugs and if it wasn't for the few who still make them.
00:09:30.567 --> 00:09:32.591
There wouldn't be access today.
00:09:33.259 --> 00:09:37.399
Yeah, that's a really good point, and I hadn't actually reflected on that potential impact.
00:09:37.399 --> 00:10:07.381
One of the things that we see and we hear a lot about currently, if we just flip back into current time, is the shortages of hormone therapy, and we know, for example, that certain pharmaceutical companies have actually stopped producing correct women's hormone therapy to make men's erectile dysfunction drugs, because there's bigger market, more money, and they just prescribe it like it's lollies, as opposed to HRT or MHT, which is so hard.
00:10:07.381 --> 00:10:14.304
So there is definitely a shift, or there has been a shift away from actually even producing female hormone therapy.
00:10:14.304 --> 00:10:17.993
So how grateful we need to be for the companies that do exist.
00:10:18.500 --> 00:10:35.501
Yeah, and I think that gets lost, as you said, because there's a lot of shortages at the moment and I've seen a lot of media and it even came up in the Senate inquiry, and one of the things that you know, I kind of I feel hasn't been unpicked is the reason there are such shortages is not necessarily anything nefarious.
00:10:35.501 --> 00:10:44.730
It's just that demand globally has skyrocketed and these companies are often small and have small production runs and they can only make so many products.
00:10:44.730 --> 00:11:00.830
So unless they build a new facility or they run their factory 24 hours a day, or someone new comes into the market, there is not the ability to just suddenly make, you know, millions more of this product, and that's where investment in women's health is so important.
00:11:00.830 --> 00:11:05.030
But, as you said, we've digressed, we're going to skip back in time.
00:11:05.030 --> 00:11:06.423
Yeah, well, it's a little bit of a.
00:11:06.423 --> 00:11:06.966
I think.
00:11:06.966 --> 00:11:13.866
You know the nuance around pharmaceutical companies is not as black and white as people like to paint it to be.
00:11:13.866 --> 00:11:17.101
Yeah, I agree, and that, I think, is kind of important.
00:11:17.142 --> 00:11:27.950
And what was exciting about this opportunity that I had was this was a company that had never done anything like this before and was like we want to want to help activate this space in Australia.
00:11:27.950 --> 00:11:29.195
There was a lot of freedom.
00:11:29.195 --> 00:11:31.322
There was not a lot of connection to the main business.
00:11:31.322 --> 00:11:36.601
There was absolutely no discussion about, you know, increasing any kind of product sales.
00:11:36.601 --> 00:11:44.812
It was very much about we see that women in Australia don't know very much about menopause and perimenopause.
00:11:44.812 --> 00:11:46.179
What could be done?
00:11:46.179 --> 00:11:51.852
If someone was willing to pay someone like you, jo, who does this for a living, what could happen?
00:11:52.779 --> 00:11:55.946
Yeah, yeah, and look at what has happened.
00:11:55.946 --> 00:12:05.893
So let's dive into what your first kind of, I guess, significant task was as a part of that role.
00:12:07.120 --> 00:12:34.504
So after mapping the parliament and seeing that there was a fantastic amount of women in parliament, the first I guess part of the role was I wanted to see who was doing stuff in the menopause space, talking to all of those key stakeholders, and you know that was really interesting because after 20 years of menopause, you know that was really interesting because after 20 years of menopause, you know kind of being demonized or HRT MHT being demonized, you know it was quite a small group of stakeholders.
00:12:34.504 --> 00:12:40.873
There were obviously people like yourself, sonia, who were trying to fill that massive gap around information and education.
00:12:40.873 --> 00:12:47.224
And that's how, you know, we connected when I was like who's doing stuff on menopause and then I discovered dear menopause.
00:12:47.423 --> 00:13:05.642
so it was, it was mapping all of that and then, seeing as I think it was about August, it was going actually the government's going to be thinking about its budget next, next year, let's put in a budget submission and start to see if we can work collaboratively with a lot of different doctors and academics to put in a budget submission.
00:13:05.642 --> 00:13:06.666
So that was step one.
00:13:06.666 --> 00:13:14.928
But as a result of that, I connected with the fabulous and late Peter Murphy and you know I wanted to meet.
00:13:14.928 --> 00:13:25.807
I'd wanted to meet with her to put perimenopause on the agenda and she actually offered and suggested doing an event in Parliament House that would be sponsored by the Parliamentary Friends of Women's Health.
00:13:26.490 --> 00:13:30.830
Beautiful, and that is what we now know as the Parliamentary Roundtable.
00:13:31.311 --> 00:13:35.250
Correct and that, again, you know, everything started to happen so fast.
00:13:35.250 --> 00:13:44.110
It was moving far more fast because, you know, when I had started the role, I'd actually said look, advocacy is very slow, it can you know you can't map it and you can't plan it.
00:13:44.110 --> 00:13:48.984
Very slow, it can you know, you can't map it and you can't plan it.
00:13:48.984 --> 00:13:50.788
It is something that is very hard to you know, wrap KPIs around.
00:13:50.788 --> 00:14:03.751
So I had kind of thought that things could take quite a few years, but it began to snowball and I think it was the momentum of having a government that had so many women in it and people were hungry and interested in a topic around women's health.
00:14:03.751 --> 00:14:13.727
And so, yeah, when Peter Murphy was like let's do something in Parliament House, of course it was like well, all right, this was in December, right before Christmas, and she's like how about early March?
00:14:13.727 --> 00:14:14.725
And I was like yay.
00:14:14.725 --> 00:14:20.628
And then I was like shit, really close, I love that, yeah, and it was a real.
00:14:20.628 --> 00:14:24.889
It was a real like okay, well, how do we want to do this If you're going to do something at Parliament House?
00:14:24.889 --> 00:14:33.335
So this would this would have been the third event I have organised at Parliament House and they are highly stressful because Parliament House is a moving, shifting beast.
00:14:33.335 --> 00:14:37.585
You never know what's going to be happening on any one day, whether anyone will turn up to your event.
00:14:37.585 --> 00:14:38.066
That is.
00:14:38.066 --> 00:14:47.620
That is the biggest heartping moment, because you can put hours and hours of love, sweat and tears into something and then, if something big happens on the day, no one turns up.
00:14:47.821 --> 00:15:00.235
So trying to put together a really engaging lineup so for me that was around having a mix of lived experience, of academic kind of credentials and also clinicians who could speak to the actual reality of seeing women and seeing patients.
00:15:00.235 --> 00:15:01.841
So it was quite an ambitious agenda.
00:15:01.841 --> 00:15:06.412
I think we had eight speakers in the end, you know, covering across that breadth.
00:15:06.412 --> 00:15:15.687
They were all incredible and so then also started working with the Australasian Menopause Society, who ended up hosting the event, and we had obviously Ginny Mansberg.
00:15:15.687 --> 00:15:21.030
I was very keen to have Dr Ginny present, given it was her book that had been the catalyst for my personal change.
00:15:21.030 --> 00:15:23.500
But we had Dr Ginny present, given it was her book that had been the catalyst for my personal change.
00:15:23.500 --> 00:15:33.149
But we had Dr Kelly Teagle from WellFam, professor Jayshree Kulkarni from the HER Centre at Monash Uni, professor Susan Davis from Monash University as well.
00:15:33.149 --> 00:15:42.831
So we had a really good array of speakers and then it was just around trying to raise awareness of the event and getting people along and what was the outcome of that event.
00:15:42.960 --> 00:15:47.192
So, from my perspective, that was when I started connecting in with everybody.
00:15:47.192 --> 00:15:49.307
You reached out to me shortly afterwards.
00:15:49.307 --> 00:15:50.986
I was aware of the roundtable.
00:15:50.986 --> 00:15:58.990
I remember that I met Shelley Horton in Sydney, actually at the New South Wales government menopause mixer that same night.
00:15:58.990 --> 00:16:04.765
So Shelley had been in Canberra at the round table and then flown up to come to this event that I was at in Sydney.
00:16:04.765 --> 00:16:20.841
It was the first time I met Shelley in person and I was really excited to hear what had happened at this round table because it was so groundbreaking for anybody that was invested, like I was at that point, in changing the conversation and raising awareness.
00:16:21.182 --> 00:16:41.211
And then I obviously met you shortly afterwards and through you connected with all the people that you've just mentioned, plus a whole host of others, and I really see you as the person that is responsible for creating this advocacy group that I feel so privileged to be a part of, because I come to it as someone with lived experience podcast host.
00:16:41.211 --> 00:16:50.224
But there are people like Professor Jayashri, kulkarni and Kelly Teagle and Ginny, and really amazing clinicians that Australia is so lucky to have.
00:16:50.224 --> 00:16:59.292
But we've all come together to create this incredible group that you spearheaded, incredible, and you know we've pushed everything forward as a result.
00:16:59.292 --> 00:17:02.125
So, from the roundtable, what were the outcomes from that?
00:17:02.787 --> 00:17:04.230
We've pushed everything forward as a result.
00:17:04.230 --> 00:17:05.692
So, from the roundtable, what were the outcomes from that?
00:17:05.692 --> 00:17:19.126
Well, I think you know, like you just said, Sonia, the key to any movement is around collaboration and working to make something that is more the sum of its parts, like being able to bring so many people together, and it creates a momentum.
00:17:19.126 --> 00:17:22.367
That is then you know what is a real catalyst for change.
00:17:22.367 --> 00:17:25.190
So I think what came out of the roundtable is the roundtable was brilliant.
00:17:25.190 --> 00:17:25.580
You know.
00:17:25.580 --> 00:17:29.612
We ended up having Assistant Minister Jed Carney open the roundtable.
00:17:29.612 --> 00:17:32.009
We had 17 members of parliament attend.
00:17:32.009 --> 00:17:34.905
For me it was a personal record, so I was really thrilled about that.
00:17:34.905 --> 00:17:36.486
You know, the conversation was really good.
00:17:36.486 --> 00:17:43.942
But around that actual roundtable meeting, we'd set up loads and loads and loads of other meetings with all of the experts.
00:17:44.001 --> 00:17:57.207
So I think there was probably about 19 meetings that was held before or after the roundtable, and it was from there that I think quite a few of the members of parliament got particularly interested in this topic.
00:17:57.207 --> 00:17:58.170
And that is what you want.
00:17:58.170 --> 00:18:00.136
You want it to be.
00:18:00.136 --> 00:18:01.582
An understanding of.
00:18:01.582 --> 00:18:03.943
This is a reality for a chunk of the population.
00:18:03.943 --> 00:18:06.335
This is, you know, that's where advocacy comes from.
00:18:06.335 --> 00:18:06.717
It's the.
00:18:06.717 --> 00:18:15.148
You're taking something from the community and taking it to Canberra, taking it to Parliament and putting it on the agenda, and I think it really had that purpose.
00:18:15.148 --> 00:18:23.532
There was quite a few MPs that then became, you know, quite personally interested in, and I remember, Sonia, you interviewed Zali Steggall not long after I did.
00:18:23.553 --> 00:18:25.938
I did actually because Zali was at the round table.
00:18:25.938 --> 00:18:27.560
I'd forgotten about that.
00:18:27.560 --> 00:18:37.343
Yeah, you're right, and that was what brought me to interview Zali was because I knew she'd been at the round table and I wanted to speak to someone from a political perspective that had been there.
00:18:37.343 --> 00:18:38.806
Yeah, that's right, yeah.
00:18:38.965 --> 00:18:49.521
And so Senator Larissa Waters was another one who I think she met with Dr Ginny and Shelley Horton around the roundtable and, you know, obviously clearly took quite an interest.
00:18:49.521 --> 00:18:53.236
So following the roundtable, there was sort of this beginning of this momentum.
00:18:53.236 --> 00:18:54.583
There were conversations happening.
00:18:54.583 --> 00:18:57.509
We saw menopause mentioned in Parliament House.
00:18:57.509 --> 00:19:18.309
We saw quite a bit of quite a few media articles come out as a result, and it was from there that, you know, some further conversations were held with different members of parliament and then Larissa Waters got passionate and decided to, you know, see if she could instigate a Senate inquiry and that's how the Senate inquiry sort of, I guess, took off.
00:19:18.309 --> 00:19:19.962
You know, it was that understanding.
00:19:19.962 --> 00:19:26.875
I think that there was a lot more to unearth or explore in this space and that it warranted further conversation.
00:19:27.160 --> 00:19:48.384
Yeah, and it was Larissa that, partnered with Senator Marielle Smith, so the two of them co-sponsored the very initial request to the Senate to have an inquiry, and I can so vividly remember the day that they stood up in the Senate and said we are co-sponsoring this inquiry.
00:19:48.384 --> 00:19:55.248
Am I right in remembering there was a vote to decide if the inquiry would even go ahead at that point?
00:19:55.248 --> 00:20:16.605
Yeah, and we were all kind of sitting around waiting to see the results and then it was unanimously voted yes, and that was just huge, absolutely huge, to even know that we'd got to the point where the senate inquiry was going to go ahead yes, and because there's only there's only a certain number of senate inquiries that are done each year, so it was going to be a real can.
00:20:16.666 --> 00:20:23.030
Can this one be squeezed in, given it was, I think it was quite late in the in the year when it was voted on, maybe October.
00:20:23.030 --> 00:20:47.021
So the fact that it got up, and I think the fact that it had a unanimous vote also speaks to the advocacy that everyone had been doing and the fact that the conversation was starting to get quite loud in the media and in amongst communities, because it meant that there was an awareness within Parliament and all the members of Parliament that actually this was a conversation that was going to be very relevant to the country, to the electorate, to their constituents.
00:20:47.363 --> 00:20:52.741
And I think a lot of people now are familiar with the fact that Senate inquiry went ahead.
00:20:52.741 --> 00:20:57.256
We went through a period where people were writing in their submissions.
00:20:57.256 --> 00:21:12.615
So there was lived experience submissions put in by multiple women's health bodies, universities, nursing bodies, catholic Women's Association in the rural and regional areas, and then from there we went into the phase of having the panels.
00:21:12.615 --> 00:21:22.074
There were seven held around the country Now, as most people will know spoke, so you got invited to speak.
00:21:22.074 --> 00:21:33.887
I guess that's the next thing to kind of cover off is that from the submissions that was put in by writing, the panel then decided who they'd like to hear in person from and give them the opportunity to expand.
00:21:33.887 --> 00:21:38.023
And I was on a lived experience panel.
00:21:38.023 --> 00:21:43.746
So I spoke from my experience of a breast cancer survivor with a medically induced menopause and it's's interesting.
00:21:43.746 --> 00:22:09.490
I actually did a podcast interview the other day with someone else for their podcast and she asked me a lot of questions around what it was like to speak on that lived experience panel and it was really interesting because it was the first time I'd unpacked all of that with someone that wasn't a part of our posse, if you like, our advocacy group, and it brought back to me how emotional that was.
00:22:09.490 --> 00:22:14.023
Now you were there with me in Sydney the day that I gave my experience.
00:22:14.023 --> 00:22:52.148
It was so emotional, yeah, and I was talking about how the you know it was incredibly emotional, but also from a logistical perspective, it was very clinical and it was five of us, sydney at our panel, and I was describing how we were all in this basically like a boardroom, if you like, no windows it was being live streamed through the Parliament's YouTube channel and into Parliament House, and so there was cameras and lights and sound engineers in the room, and then we were sitting facing the Senate panel and then behind us was the public gallery, I guess, if you like, which for me.
00:22:52.289 --> 00:22:53.153
I was really lucky.
00:22:53.153 --> 00:23:02.967
I had a number of supporters you amongst others that were sitting there with us, but there was also women on the panel with me that had just turned up by themselves.
00:23:02.967 --> 00:23:09.739
They had no support with them and you know we had three minutes to give our evidence statement.
00:23:09.739 --> 00:23:23.922
Now, being lived experience, we were de-identified, so it was given from an anonymous perspective and we weren't asked questions, so we just had three minutes to give our statement and then it was like thank you very much, appreciate your transparency and your honesty.
00:23:23.922 --> 00:23:30.727
And then moving on to the next person, and I found that really hard, not just the giving my story.
00:23:30.727 --> 00:23:51.128
I then very quickly shifted from being emotional about myself to supporting her and I was sitting there rubbing her back and like kind of supporting her.
00:23:51.128 --> 00:23:58.000
Yes, and it was such a strange experience Like I'm so grateful that I got the opportunity.
00:23:58.000 --> 00:24:02.823
It was such a privilege to be able to present this information, but gosh, it was hard.
00:24:03.083 --> 00:24:17.582
Yes, and because they moved from each lived experience presenter quite quickly Everyone had been chosen because they had very rich stories to tell I found myself I ended up in tears.
00:24:17.582 --> 00:24:20.027
It was very, very emotional, very draining.
00:24:20.027 --> 00:24:23.894
I mean very powerful is the other emotion that really struck me.
00:24:23.894 --> 00:24:49.602
But then it was all quite clinical because you know, the hearing was on a timeline and it was like, okay, all right, now you guys, you're done on to the next person and you're like, wow, that's kind of a lot of people reliving you know what is quite a lot of trauma, often Trauma, yeah, and then you know, moving on, which, when you're time pressured, you kind of understand.
00:24:49.622 --> 00:24:57.710
But I think what was powerful about all of those lived experience components across all the seven hearings is I think that's where you got the real nuance and the real depth which is so important to policymaking.
00:24:57.769 --> 00:25:18.606
So you know, as someone who's worked in policy for such a long time, you know you can have your clinicians and you can have your academics and they present very important things around data, around what guidelines are, but it misses the grey in between, it misses the impacts on actual human beings and that's where I think it's so important to the policy process to hear those lived experience stories.
00:25:18.606 --> 00:25:36.576
And I guess that's where I think it's so important to the policy process to hear those lived experience stories and I guess that's a real thank you from the Australian community to yourself and the others who are on those panels for reliving that trauma so that there could be your experience taken into the next step, which is formulating policy.
00:25:36.576 --> 00:25:46.145
And I think if you listen to all of the senators who are on that panel, they have all spoken about how impactful the lived experience components were.
00:25:46.626 --> 00:25:47.549
Yeah, yeah they have.
00:25:47.549 --> 00:26:03.929
And things that made me so proud when you know, had that moment when the recommendations were tabled in parliament recently and you know, if you read down the list of 1 to 25 in numerical order, the very first one is about having a consumer awareness campaign.
00:26:03.929 --> 00:26:19.667
But what made me so proud about that was that they presented in that recommendation that it must be co-designed with lived experience and that just made me so proud for myself but for everyone else that was involved from a lived experience perspective.
00:26:20.490 --> 00:26:33.113
And I think that's key, because so often if you don't have that lived experience component, then the policy or the campaign is not actually attached to the reality of how it's going to affect women's lives.
00:26:33.113 --> 00:26:40.814
But so, yeah, now we're right at the critical juncture of what happens next with that awesome report and those incredible recommendations.
00:26:41.404 --> 00:26:42.450
Yes, we are.
00:26:42.450 --> 00:26:46.048
So, Jo, you have experience with this, so talk us through.
00:26:46.048 --> 00:26:47.734
What should we expect now?
00:26:49.145 --> 00:27:01.055
So this is what I would say is almost the most important part of the campaign, because this is where we don't want that report to sit gathering dust, you know, somewhere in Parliament House with oh there's some good ideas, but we'll get to that later.
00:27:01.055 --> 00:27:02.549
There's more pressing issues.
00:27:02.549 --> 00:27:22.042
This is where it's really important to write or engage with your local representative and both the government and the coalition, because we will have an election sometime in the next six to 12 months, and so this is an opportunity to get some actual commitments from the government or from the coalition around what they will do to address these recommendations.
00:27:22.042 --> 00:27:32.701
Ideally, you want to see all 25 recommendations adopted and turned into policy so that there is real change, and most of them are very easy to do.
00:27:32.701 --> 00:27:38.634
Most of them would not take a lot of effort or funding to turn into reality.
00:27:39.395 --> 00:28:03.873
I think that's a note that we really need to just take a moment to really kind of recognise again is that it is again back in our hands, as the public, to put the pressure on our representatives, and that's at a federal level, it's at a state level, it's everybody to make sure that these recommendations continue to get pushed through.
00:28:04.295 --> 00:28:10.611
Think about it like this I think there's roughly 3 million Australians in the menopause transition at the moment.
00:28:10.611 --> 00:28:14.018
That is a large cohort of the electorate.
00:28:14.018 --> 00:28:25.938
That is a lot of voting power when it comes to an election, and I think what the Senate inquiry has demonstrated is that it wouldn't take much to really improve health outcomes for women in this cohort.
00:28:25.938 --> 00:28:33.790
So to me it makes good electoral sense, as well as good economic sense, to implement these recommendations in full.
00:28:33.790 --> 00:28:36.010
But, as you said, there's a couple of things you can do.
00:28:36.010 --> 00:28:37.715
You can continue to put the pressure on.
00:28:37.984 --> 00:28:50.134
Welfam has actually got on their website a link to a pro forma letter that you can use and then adapt to send to your local representative, because it is critical that all parliamentarians understand that this is an issue of importance.
00:28:50.134 --> 00:28:53.287
It's not just the health minister or the assistant health minister.
00:28:53.287 --> 00:29:00.873
It needs to be understood that this is a widespread issue that affects, you know, 50% of the population at some point in their life.
00:29:00.873 --> 00:29:03.157
So there is the momentum to do that.
00:29:03.157 --> 00:29:14.377
And what makes me feel a little bit optimistic as a policy wonk is there's nothing like an election to make parties get really behind particular issues and really commit to them.
00:29:14.377 --> 00:29:30.536
So from my perspective, this is the perfect time to get both the government and the opposition to commit to recommending the inquiry in full, and ideally I'd love to see the government they could get a few of those recommendations done and dusted before the election.
00:29:31.377 --> 00:29:32.338
Yeah, so talk me through.
00:29:32.338 --> 00:29:34.733
So, going back, there's a couple of things I wanted to pick up on there.
00:29:34.733 --> 00:29:39.435
One we do know that there will be an election coming up.
00:29:39.435 --> 00:29:45.744
Yep, once an election is called, the government then goes into like a caretaker mode, doesn't it Correct?
00:29:45.744 --> 00:29:47.611
And nothing kind of happens in that space.
00:29:47.611 --> 00:29:48.152
Is that right?
00:29:48.574 --> 00:29:55.733
Yes, yes, I think it's six weeks Actually I have to check that, but I think it's six weeks before the election.
00:29:55.733 --> 00:29:56.236
It goes into caretaker.
00:29:56.236 --> 00:29:59.268
There can be no new policies, no new funding allocated.
00:29:59.268 --> 00:30:02.213
It's basically like a shutdown period for government.
00:30:02.213 --> 00:30:09.424
So what you can do, though, you can work with governments and the opposition to commit to what they will do after the election.
00:30:09.424 --> 00:30:10.426
That's where you've still got.
00:30:10.426 --> 00:30:18.974
There's still that leverage to say well, should you be re-elected, what exactly will you do and what are the steps and the timelines and the amounts of money?
00:30:18.974 --> 00:30:20.088
So you'll see.
00:30:20.088 --> 00:30:24.654
If you think about it, you see a lot of election pledges in the lead-up to the election.
00:30:24.654 --> 00:30:27.934
You know we're going to give $50 million to diabetes.