March 20, 2025

113: Hot Take with Sonya and Johanna

The player is loading ...
113: Hot Take with Sonya and Johanna

Updates on the rapidly changing landscape of menopause care in Australia and globally, focusing on revolutionary PBS changes making hormone therapy more affordable and the growing momentum around women's health initiatives.

• Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) now includes Estrogel, Prometrium, and Estrogel Pro (as of March 1st), with Slinder joining May 1st

• PBS prescriptions require specific coding - you may need a new prescription to access subsidised pricing

• FDA removed warnings from testosterone in the USA, highlighting the need for Australia to update outdated warnings on vaginal estrogen products

• The "So Hot Right Now" Medical Conference created an inclusive learning environment for healthcare providers to discuss menopause care

• Government funding for GP education ($1.5 million) lacks sufficient scope and evaluation mechanisms

• Dr. Lisa Mosconi leading a $50 million research program to reduce Alzheimer's in women by studying the relationship between protective hormones and brain health

• Jo launches Sheela Consulting - Unapologetic Advocacy, focusing on women's health policy and advocacy

If you've missed any of our expert conversations over the past two years, go back and listen, and please share them with anyone who needs this information.

To listen to my previous episode and interview with Assistant Minister Ged Kearney, please head to episode 110.

Links:

Johanna Wicks - LinkedIn

So Hot Right Now Medical Conference

Dr Lisa Mosconi - CARE funding

Australian Government $573M funding


Thank you for listening to my show!

Join the conversation on Instagram

🤝 You can connect with Sonya here

💬 Send me a message here

❤️ Loved this episode? Share with a friend and don't forget to leave us a review and rating here 

 

Chapters

00:00 - Welcome to A Hot Take

01:50 - PBS Changes & Prescription Requirements

10:54 - FDA Removes Testosterone Warnings

15:28 - So Hot Right Now Medical Conference

26:08 - GP Education Funding Concerns

31:41 - $50 Million Alzheimer's Research Initiative

38:27 - Sheela Consulting - Unapologetic Advocacy Launch

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:01.582 --> 00:00:04.107
Welcome to the Dear Menopause podcast.

00:00:04.107 --> 00:00:06.772
I'm Sonya Lovell, your host Now.

00:00:06.772 --> 00:00:11.929
I've been bringing you conversations with amazing menopause experts for over two years now.

00:00:11.929 --> 00:00:21.128
If you have missed any of those conversations, now's the time to go back and listen, and you can always share them with anyone you think needs to hear them.

00:00:21.128 --> 00:00:28.672
This way, more people can find these amazing conversations, needs to hear them.

00:00:28.672 --> 00:00:30.859
This way, more people can find these amazing conversations.

00:00:30.859 --> 00:00:42.567
Welcome to this week's episode of A Hot Take, with Johanna Wicks and myself here to bring you up to date on all of the hot topics that are currently impacting the menopause conversation globally, but, most importantly, here in Australia.

00:00:42.567 --> 00:00:43.591
Jo, welcome.

00:00:43.880 --> 00:00:48.406
Lovely to be back I think it's been just over a month and, wow, a lot has happened in that month.

00:00:48.908 --> 00:00:50.152
It's been a huge month.

00:00:50.152 --> 00:00:53.950
I'm going to mention upfront that I got COVID a couple of weeks ago.

00:00:53.950 --> 00:00:56.076
I lost my NOVID status.

00:00:56.076 --> 00:00:59.603
I had never had COVID up until dodged it for five years.

00:00:59.603 --> 00:01:02.590
I know I thought I was special Apparently not.

00:01:02.890 --> 00:01:04.993
Sonya, where did you get your COVID from?

00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:18.631
Well, jo, not that I want to apportion blame on anybody, and it isn't the takeaway that I was hoping for, but I did get sick after the so Hot Right Now weekend in Sydney.

00:01:18.631 --> 00:01:25.409
Basically, I had a big day on the Friday and the Saturday and woke up very, very unwell on the Monday.

00:01:25.409 --> 00:01:28.183
So, look, I hugged a lot of people.

00:01:28.183 --> 00:01:32.456
Thanks for all the hugs, but no thanks to the COVID.

00:01:32.456 --> 00:01:37.828
But why I wanted to mention that was because my voice is still doing strange and weird and wonderful things.

00:01:37.828 --> 00:01:41.865
So if I start to lose my voice or my voice sounds a bit scratchy or wobbly.

00:01:41.865 --> 00:01:46.867
That's why and I'll just let Jo do all the talking if that's what ends up happening Great, my favorite.

00:01:46.867 --> 00:01:49.921
Awesome, jo, we have got lots to talk about.

00:01:49.921 --> 00:01:51.667
What are we going to kick off with today?

00:01:51.906 --> 00:02:16.149
Well, I think it would be very timely to yet again kick off talking about the PBS, the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme, because since we last spoke, the 1st of March has been, which saw Estrogel, prometrium and Estrogel Pro hit the PBS and Yasmin, and then on the weekend there was another announcement from the Albanese government with more drugs for women's health going onto the PBS.

00:02:16.149 --> 00:02:20.346
It's just, I mean, it's sort of an unprecedented deluge of awesome medication.

00:02:20.926 --> 00:02:22.711
It really is, isn't it so?

00:02:22.711 --> 00:02:40.503
Slinder was the announcement, the big announcement that's going to impact most likely our perimenopausal menopausal listeners that is going to be available as of the 1st of may as a pbs priced drug therapy fantastic and I think what is super excited about this is after, um, the 1st of march.

00:02:40.524 --> 00:02:43.012
You know I've done a bunch of posts and different platforms around the fact that especially prometrium had gone onto the pbs.

00:02:43.012 --> 00:02:43.915
And but you, this is after the 1st of March.

00:02:43.915 --> 00:02:56.183
You know I've done a bunch of posts and different platforms around the fact that especially Prometrium had gone onto the PBS and you know sort of saying, you know, obviously we know there's some other amazing drugs out there and what would people like to see also on the PBS.

00:02:56.183 --> 00:03:00.051
And you know, out of all the responses I got, Slinder came up the most.

00:03:00.312 --> 00:03:00.753
The most.

00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:15.336
So I think there'll be a lot of very happy women across Australia, especially because Slinder is, so it really works from basically kind of your teenage years through to being almost post-menopausal, because it's sort of safe across all age cohorts.

00:03:15.336 --> 00:03:22.400
So it's a very versatile drug and that a lot of people who are progesterone sensitive can tolerate quite well.

00:03:22.439 --> 00:03:23.022
Can tolerate.

00:03:23.022 --> 00:03:23.664
Yeah, it's.

00:03:23.664 --> 00:03:24.388
It's fantastic.

00:03:24.870 --> 00:03:41.383
Now, whilst we are excited about all of these amazing um new drugs turning up onto the pbs being cheaper, there has been quite a bit of conversation, I've noticed around the need to get a new prescription to be able to be eligible for the new pbs pricing.

00:03:41.383 --> 00:04:04.455
So obviously now, since since we're past the 1st of March for your, as you said, prometrium, estrogel and Estrogel Pro, and something to bear in mind with Slinder coming up on the 1st of May so the correct procedure around this is if you have a prescription that is dated after the 1st of March, then you will be getting that automatically at the PBS rates.

00:04:04.455 --> 00:04:19.333
However, if your prescription was dated prior to that, some pharmacies and from what I can gather, most pharmacies are requiring you to get a new, updated prescription so that that can go through their system at the PBS.

00:04:19.333 --> 00:04:22.247
That the correct coding with the correct pricing attached to it.

00:04:22.247 --> 00:04:31.069
I thought it'd be good for us to just kind of talk through this a little bit, because I was surprised at the amount of conversation that came up around this from women.

00:04:31.670 --> 00:04:48.853
Me too, and I think you know I've just made an appointment for next week to go and get all my scripts updated because I use Estrogel and I think that it's a little bit tricky because obviously that it'd be lovely if all pharmacists could just honour your current script, and I believe a very small minority are able to.

00:04:48.853 --> 00:05:01.290
But it is very hard in the bureaucratic system that is, you know Medicare, to make sure you've got all your codes that are lined up and it is much easier just to have a script that has the correct codes on it.

00:05:01.290 --> 00:05:22.949
And the other thing I wanted to add to that, sonya, which is something I only learned when I was at the so Hot Right Now medical conference I hadn't realized that you need to specifically ask your doctor for a 60-day dispensing and then you get two months worth of the medication for $31, which blew my mind.

00:05:23.069 --> 00:05:33.387
I was so excited about the fact that you know especially, estrogel Pro is on PBS and is now $31 for both medications in their one pack.

00:05:33.387 --> 00:05:40.415
Yeah, yeah, to get two months' worth for $31 was just like oh, that is a huge cost saving.

00:05:40.898 --> 00:05:43.228
I know I did a post and this was when I realised the conversation that was coming up around the prescriptions.

00:05:43.228 --> 00:05:46.983
I did a post and this was when I realized the conversation that was coming up around the prescriptions.

00:05:46.983 --> 00:05:48.867
I did a post because I happened to.

00:05:48.867 --> 00:05:58.588
Actually, I think I ran out of my progesterone, my prometrium, about two days before the 1st of March, so I literally didn't get mine filled until after that date had ticked over.

00:05:58.588 --> 00:06:02.341
And look, I have a fantastic pharmacist, small, local pharmacy.

00:06:02.341 --> 00:06:05.206
I've got a great relationship with him, he knows what I do.

00:06:05.206 --> 00:06:20.887
So I was walking, I was like John, we did it, we're on the PBS and, um, you know, I did have a relatively new prescription, was probably dated more like the start of February, and he honored that for me and put it through at the new PBS pricing which you know.

00:06:20.887 --> 00:06:24.302
It was literally on the first or the second of March that I got down there to get that.

00:06:24.302 --> 00:06:35.923
Now I was paying $97.60, I think, or something like that, for my 60-day Prometrium and I got it at $31.60.

00:06:35.923 --> 00:06:38.213
And I was just beside myself.

00:06:38.213 --> 00:06:45.850
I was so excited, which is why I came up and photographed it and popped it onto my Instagram to let everyone know, but yeah, then the whole thing about the prescriptions came up.

00:06:45.910 --> 00:07:06.242
So I thought what might be a nice idea is if we just talk through the different options that you have available to you to actually get a new prescription, because I did notice that there was a lot of people that felt that it wasn't right that they would then have to go and book a whole new appointment with their GP and just to go in to just get their prescription updated.

00:07:06.603 --> 00:07:22.930
Now you and I are lucky enough to have a lot of friends that are GPs a lot of colleagues and we sit in different conversation groups with them, and it was interesting seeing the conversations going back and forth between them about how different GPs and different GP clinics were managing the need for updated prescriptions.

00:07:23.351 --> 00:07:45.428
I think one of the things that came up regularly was that there is an option for some clinics through hot docs, so if you're doing an online booking, you can put in that that you just require an updated prescription and then it might be that your GP just does a telehealth call with you that's bulk billed and just ticks the box that they have had a conversation with you and they will send you through via text.

00:07:45.488 --> 00:08:03.906
Often I get all my prescriptions now via text and updated prescription, and that there was also other GPs that were offering telehealth calls for their patients, rather than thinking that you have to book in to go in and sit in the waiting room and have this big long process of having a GP appointment and the cost that's associated with it.

00:08:03.906 --> 00:08:16.665
So I guess my takeaway from those conversations and being able to sit on the fence a little bit and hear both sides of the stories is, if you do require a new prescription, just reach out to your clinic and ask them what your options are.

00:08:16.665 --> 00:08:19.262
Don't assume that you're going to have to go in and see someone.

00:08:19.262 --> 00:08:22.050
Maybe just give them a call and ask them what your options are.

00:08:22.521 --> 00:08:28.528
Because the likelihood is that they've come up with a way of dealing with it, because there's been a lot of women talking about this.

00:08:28.528 --> 00:08:39.192
But it is important to note that if you are using like a 60-day prescribing for the first time, then you know that might be not as easy as just replenishing your script.

00:08:39.333 --> 00:08:40.120
Yeah, that's a good point.

00:08:40.240 --> 00:08:52.086
And, as Sonya just said, you know, it is definitely worth making sure that you get the two-month code, so that it is $31 a month is great, $31 for two months is even better.

00:08:52.607 --> 00:09:00.466
Yeah, and I suppose the only other thing I'd like to say around that is don't get cranky with your pharmacist, don't get cranky with your GP.

00:09:00.466 --> 00:09:05.011
You know this is a procedure and protocol situation.

00:09:05.011 --> 00:09:14.302
There is codes and ways that things have to go through computer systems for them to be able to dispense or to provide you with a prescription.

00:09:14.302 --> 00:09:17.109
The system's not ideal, we all know that.

00:09:17.109 --> 00:09:21.188
So just be patient, find out what your options are that are going to work best for you.

00:09:21.188 --> 00:09:29.597
But yes, it is likely that you are going to need to get a new prescription and then think about adding up all the money that you'll save from now until eternity.

00:09:30.461 --> 00:09:33.229
If you're going to take your MHT until death, like I am.

00:09:33.791 --> 00:09:34.251
And me.

00:09:35.623 --> 00:09:36.711
And that's a huge saving.

00:09:36.711 --> 00:09:38.725
And I think that's one of the things I did want to acknowledge.

00:09:38.725 --> 00:10:03.785
You know, I wanted to acknowledge that these are big changes and, you know, obviously there's a bit of political fostering going on which I've tried not to roll my eyes at, but I have others in the political space, sort of being like we're equally committed, and I have felt a sense of frustration because I was like, well, you were in government for 10 years and you didn't put any of these drugs on the PBS and you had plenty of opportunity in that 10 years to do so.

00:10:03.785 --> 00:10:11.070
So I do think that what the current government has done in getting so many new drugs on the PBS does matter.

00:10:11.070 --> 00:10:13.989
It doesn't mean that we stop asking for more.

00:10:14.421 --> 00:10:19.403
Like, when I did the little survey, people had mentioned Zoli as another contraceptive.

00:10:19.403 --> 00:10:22.152
That's really really, really impressive and really effective.

00:10:22.152 --> 00:10:25.980
Androfem is the only female testosterone in the world.

00:10:25.980 --> 00:10:39.113
A lot of chatter about intra rosa, um, which only came into Australia last year, but is a new, incredible vaginal estrogen, and DHEA, yeah, um and got to talk about a lot.

00:10:39.153 --> 00:10:39.813
It's so hot right now.

00:10:39.813 --> 00:10:40.421
So there are.

00:10:40.421 --> 00:10:47.942
There are drugs that need to go on the PBS, but this is kind of like an exciting start and it feels like there's real motivation behind it.

00:10:48.303 --> 00:10:50.048
Yeah, absolutely 100%.

00:10:50.048 --> 00:10:53.227
All right, so where does that lead us?

00:10:53.227 --> 00:10:53.889
What's next?

00:10:53.889 --> 00:11:02.399
Should we talk about the FDA removing, while we're talking about drugs and hormones and you just mentioned androfem and testosterone, you know, as part of that conversation.

00:11:02.399 --> 00:11:07.152
So if you have been a long-time listener, first of all, thank you very much.

00:11:07.152 --> 00:11:23.388
Secondly, you'll probably remember us talking about the push in the US specifically to remove the warnings, the black box warnings, from your vaginal estrogen, and we were talking about the fact that testosterone also falls into that kind of category as well.

00:11:23.388 --> 00:11:34.527
So the FDA have actually gone ahead and removed the, or they're going to remove I can't quite remember the process remove the warnings from testosterone in the US.

00:11:35.148 --> 00:12:13.860
Yeah, and there's quite a long story behind it, but there was a worry that men using testosterone in the US was contributing to their cardiovascular risk and bad or adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and so what actually happened is the FDA, which is the American version of the TGA, actually requested that there be a big randomized control trial looking at testosterone in men with a history of cardiovascular disease or a high chance of developing cardiovascular disease, and they actually compelled the four big companies that provide testosterone in the US to pay for it.

00:12:13.860 --> 00:12:21.188
To my understanding, it was a very extensive study, but I think it looked at over 5,000 men, of which half had a placebo and half were given testosterone.

00:12:21.188 --> 00:12:41.470
The results came back and showed that there is no increased cardiovascular risk or negative outcomes for that cohort, which was quite amazing, and I think that study concluded maybe just over 12 months ago, or the results were presented 12 months ago, but now a couple of I think it was even on the 1st of March.

00:12:41.470 --> 00:12:43.085
I feel like a lot happened on the 1st of March.

00:12:43.085 --> 00:13:03.927
Yeah, maybe it was yeah, because Kelly Casperson did a post while she was in Australia about it, and so the FDA has actually said right, we've taken into consideration this study and we now are going to take off the warnings around cardiovascular risk associated with testosterone for men in the US.

00:13:03.927 --> 00:13:19.913
But why this is, I think, important, samuel, which is what you're alluding to is it shows that things can change and that the labelling on medication can be updated or removed, in this case, when evidence comes to light.

00:13:19.994 --> 00:13:28.014
And I think one of the things that has been frustrating for women in Australia and the US and the UK and around the world is that there are I mean, who said it?

00:13:28.014 --> 00:13:42.389
I think was it Kelly who said there's 500 studies of vaginal estrogen in breast cancer patients that show that vaginal estrogen is safe to use and across 25,000 women.

00:13:42.389 --> 00:13:48.182
And yet we still have these really dire warnings on vaginal estrogen in Australia.

00:13:48.182 --> 00:14:02.727
And I think this is a call out to the government, to the TGA, that you can choose to take these non-factual risks out of these products, and I mean I don't think they don't have to have anyone ask them to do that.

00:14:02.727 --> 00:14:08.183
They could voluntarily decide to review the literature and do this off their own bat, hint, hint TGA.

00:14:09.861 --> 00:14:33.302
Or, you know, we could also look at having a bit of a campaign to Theramex, novonordic and Aspen, who make the three vaginal estrogen products in Australia and look at the three of those companies, could also approach the tga and say, hey, you know what, these warnings are outdated and we actually have evidence to the contrary.

00:14:33.302 --> 00:14:35.746
So can we please, can we please take that out?

00:14:35.746 --> 00:14:44.900
Um, so, yes, thinking about how we could make australia you know, we could lead the world in this because the us, the fda, has has not acted yet on vaginal estrogen.

00:14:44.900 --> 00:14:47.143
I mean, try not to think about sexism.

00:14:47.143 --> 00:14:51.187
Much testosterone for men oh yes, let's quickly fix that up.

00:14:51.187 --> 00:14:57.711
Vaginal estrogen for women so, trying not to look at it with that gender lens, they're failing.

00:14:57.711 --> 00:15:03.517
So yeah, jalia, wonderful government, get moving on vaginal estrogen.

00:15:07.019 --> 00:15:10.336
Another easy fix for you to do, yeah, another one that will make lots of women happy and also probably increase the uptake.

00:15:10.336 --> 00:15:19.841
Because I mean, sonya, I think you last time on the podcast we spoke about this you know you talked about how women have opened it up, looked at the pamphlet and gone oh, it says you're going to die of everything.

00:15:19.900 --> 00:15:24.812
It's actually really dire it is, it's awful, all right.

00:15:24.812 --> 00:16:08.024
So from there, I think, whilst we're kind of talking about government and, you know, things that they can do to improve outcomes for women, the um conversation that I had recently with jed carney when she was a guest on my podcast and one of the topics that we talked about was the part of the 573 million dollar pledge was to provide education to GPs, to upskill our clinicians, because, as Ceri Cashell said so beautifully on her Instagram the other day, it's great to make all of these therapies and these drugs more accessible and more affordable, but let's educate the people that are going to prescribe them.

00:16:08.524 --> 00:16:11.385
Yes, because there are so many GPs who won't prescribe.

00:16:11.405 --> 00:16:13.267
Who still have reservations.

00:16:13.267 --> 00:16:14.807
Let's put it that way.

00:16:14.807 --> 00:16:18.950
Okay, so we wanted to talk about two things.

00:16:18.950 --> 00:16:26.174
We want to do a quick debrief from the medical conference that was a part of the so Hot Right Now weekend.

00:16:26.174 --> 00:16:38.192
I didn't attend, but you did Want to talk about what I want to hear from you because we actually haven't spoken about this yet what it was like to be in the room, what you felt the energy and the vibe was from the doctors that attended.

00:16:38.192 --> 00:16:52.407
There was a huge online cohort as well and then perhaps feed that into what the government could consider doing when it comes to apportioning the funding for that GP education.

00:16:52.988 --> 00:16:54.350
Oh gosh, you're right.

00:16:54.350 --> 00:16:55.192
A quick conversation.

00:16:55.192 --> 00:16:57.705
I have a lot to say on this, sorry.

00:16:57.705 --> 00:16:59.109
Okay, let's start with so Hot Right Now.

00:16:59.208 --> 00:17:15.957
So the reason I was at the medical conference because obviously I'm not a medical practitioner is I was supporting Healthy Hormones, who were the organisers and the hosts of that component of the so Hot Right Now extravaganza weekend.

00:17:15.957 --> 00:17:24.282
So the medical conference was held on the Sunday after the event at the Opera House and it was done in the Hyatt Regency.

00:17:24.282 --> 00:17:38.865
So we had, I think, 250 people attend in real life and I can't remember I think it was around 500 online, but I can't actually remember that off the top of my head and it was like nothing I have been to before.

00:17:38.865 --> 00:17:40.564
So I've been lucky enough.

00:17:40.564 --> 00:17:46.848
In my, when I was working in a pharmaceutical company, I got to go to an international menopause society meeting in Portugal.

00:17:46.848 --> 00:17:48.424
Two and a half years ago I got to go to an International Menopause Society meeting in Portugal two and a half years ago.

00:17:48.424 --> 00:17:55.506
I've been to two Australasian Menopause Society conferences and you know I learned a lot at all of those conferences.

00:17:55.755 --> 00:18:04.548
But I think what was so striking about the so Hot Right Now medical conference was the energy and it was just this incredible buzz?

00:18:04.548 --> 00:18:05.961
I mean, you were there at the Opera House.

00:18:05.961 --> 00:18:07.981
You felt the buzz in the audience.

00:18:07.981 --> 00:18:09.005
Oh my gosh.

00:18:09.977 --> 00:18:11.323
It was very similar to that.

00:18:11.323 --> 00:18:14.618
It had been carefully thought out, all the speakers they had.

00:18:14.618 --> 00:18:17.140
I sat at the back because I was like you know, I've heard this all before.

00:18:17.140 --> 00:18:23.980
And then I was madly taking notes because I was learning so much more, even though I've listened to the podcasts of most of the presenters.

00:18:23.980 --> 00:18:27.957
I've been to so many of these types of conferences yeah, it was.

00:18:27.957 --> 00:18:36.143
And then they had an incredible space for sponsors to be able to talk to the attendees and that was just buzzing the whole day.

00:18:37.115 --> 00:18:40.645
Can I pause you there for a second and ask a question or clarify something?

00:18:40.645 --> 00:18:43.200
So for anybody that's listening, that's not familiar.

00:18:43.200 --> 00:18:57.768
The presenters at the medical conference on the Sunday were the same presenters that were on stage at the Opera House, so we're talking about Dr Louise Newson, Dr Kelly Casperson, Dr Vonda Wright, Dr Mary-Claire Haver.

00:18:57.768 --> 00:18:59.519
Was there anyone else that presented?

00:18:59.519 --> 00:19:01.526
Did we have some local representation as well?

00:19:02.075 --> 00:19:21.685
Yes, yes, so we had Dr Angela Kwong, we had Dr Odette Best, we had Dr Talat Uppel, so you can actually there is, the website is still up and it sort of goes through what everybody spoke about, and if you're a medical professional, it is going to be available to watch as webinars as well.

00:19:21.685 --> 00:19:29.208
There was a couple of things that came up again and again when I was talking to people in the breaks and at the end of the day was next year can we have it over two days?

00:19:29.208 --> 00:19:39.028
And the other main takeaway that I felt was really different from other medical conferences that I've been to was just the feeling of it being a room full of equals.

00:19:39.028 --> 00:19:41.061
There was no hierarchy.

00:19:41.474 --> 00:19:47.628
I had a number of GPs say that they didn't feel like they were spoken down to, that they were treated as lesser.

00:19:47.628 --> 00:20:05.803
In fact, Vonda Wright did this beautiful speech because a number of the speakers had two slots and spoke about different things, and when she came back I think it was after lunch or afternoon break to do her second slot, she actually stood up and said I just want to raise something.

00:20:05.803 --> 00:20:10.122
I've had so many lovely conversations here today, but I want to stop you now.

00:20:10.122 --> 00:20:19.388
I want to stop everyone who has said to me, I'm just a mere GP from using that kind of terminology and framing yourself in that way.

00:20:19.388 --> 00:20:26.269
I'm paraphrasing here, but she was basically like being a GP is exceptionally important.

00:20:26.269 --> 00:20:31.082
The fact that I'm an orthopedic surgeon does not make me better, you know, than you.

00:20:31.202 --> 00:20:31.923
It was, it was just.

00:20:31.923 --> 00:20:35.326
It was really nice, and I've never really heard that acknowledged before.

00:20:35.326 --> 00:20:38.478
So I think a lot of people that I spoke to were then sort of going.

00:20:38.478 --> 00:20:40.943
I just felt like I could ask anything.

00:20:40.943 --> 00:20:42.797
I felt like nothing was off the table.

00:20:42.797 --> 00:21:20.662
I didn't feel like I, you know, had to be anything other than who I was, and I think for a medical conference, that says quite a lot, and I think that the Healthy Hormones team are going to be, you know, evaluating the event and I really have my fingers crossed that they decide to continue on this path, because it gave an opportunity for so many practitioners to ask questions, and I think that's really important, you know, from a learning perspective, is that everybody has a different learning style, regardless of what your profession is and who you are, and whether you have a professor or a doctor before your name.

00:21:20.962 --> 00:21:35.965
You know, and there are many upskilling courses that are available online that are very simplistic in many respects and they are, you know, maybe kind of directed at the lowest common denominator.

00:21:36.406 --> 00:21:44.355
Yeah, yeah, and it doesn't give you the opportunity to ask questions beyond what you're being taught as you go through that online syllabus.

00:21:44.355 --> 00:21:50.807
You don't have contact with a real person that is actually operating in this field, day in, day out, every day.

00:21:50.807 --> 00:22:00.044
So, yeah, when you're able to learn in an environment where there is open conversation that's inclusive, it just takes learning to a whole other level, doesn't it?

00:22:00.634 --> 00:22:02.098
Yeah, I mean the excitement.

00:22:02.098 --> 00:22:07.439
The doctor, like the people I spoke to, were just like buzzing, and I think you've raised some really good points.

00:22:07.439 --> 00:22:20.640
There is, I think, one of the things that what healthy hormones are trying to do is they are trying to meet GPs where they're at and come up with ways of sharing information that works in the 21st century.

00:22:20.640 --> 00:22:25.169
So their platform healthy hormones is, you know, it's live.

00:22:25.169 --> 00:22:26.357
There's lots there are.

00:22:26.357 --> 00:22:34.721
There are specific spaces for GPs and other allied healthcare professionals to have conversations with each other in like real time about what's happening with patients.

00:22:34.721 --> 00:22:36.421
There's also fact sheets.

00:22:36.421 --> 00:22:42.721
They're putting together webinars which will be focused on very like sort of niche areas as well as the big picture areas.

00:22:42.815 --> 00:22:58.759
But it's once you get beyond your kind of average perimenopausal or menopausal woman where gps are often sort of left floundering, whether it be something like migraines or how it interacts with adhd or interacts with endometriosis or you know, there there is, there is endless.

00:22:58.759 --> 00:23:29.798
So it is it's this constantly involving space, and so then when you've got practitioners that are looking at all the research and wanting to make that available real time, and that's the other thing, like Wellfem, which is Australia's leading telehealth space for menopausal care, you know, I know they've got some really brilliant ideas about replicating the GP psychiatry line where, you know, gps could actually call a telehealth hotline manned by menopause experts to get real-time information if they've got a patient in front of them.

00:23:30.300 --> 00:23:48.182
Yeah, which really should be able to then eliminate that situation for a woman who goes in to see her GP and the GP doesn't know the answer and let's be honest, GPs don't have all the answers all the time at their fingertips, you know, and maybe it is a more complicated aspect of their perimenopause or their menopause experience.

00:23:48.182 --> 00:24:12.050
But if there is a service available, whether it's through a platform like Healthy Hormones, where they can jump into a chat with whoever's online and workshop the situation with them, or whether it's through, you know, a welfare call with a specialist, it just means that the patient, at the end of the day, should be getting a much better level of healthcare than just being told I don't know.

00:24:12.050 --> 00:24:13.576
Go Google it, sort yourself out.

00:24:13.958 --> 00:24:15.403
Go shop around, go try yeah.

00:24:15.564 --> 00:24:21.181
Or us always saying just go get a second opinion, go find another GP, which isn't as easy as it sounds for a lot of people.

00:24:21.642 --> 00:24:27.484
No, my GP has just moved to another part of Victoria and I'm like, oh, now I've got to start again.

00:24:27.484 --> 00:24:28.386
Really annoying.

00:24:28.386 --> 00:24:34.423
But yeah, it's not like those sort of appointments or those sort of skilled GPs are readily available.

00:24:34.423 --> 00:24:40.424
So I think there's a lot of exciting options for how the government could look at the GP medical training component.

00:24:40.424 --> 00:24:56.920
But I guess this is where, for all the excitement and how much love I feel like I have right now for Albanese government and Ged and Marielle and Katie and Mark Butler, I have got a little bit of less love around the GP education component.

00:24:56.920 --> 00:25:05.502
So you know, when we finally dug into the detail after that incredible announcement on the 9th of February, that is the weak link.

00:25:05.502 --> 00:25:17.621
So much of what we had hoped would be addressed after two and a half years of advocacy we've been doing is addressed, but the GP education is the weak link.

00:25:17.621 --> 00:25:18.502
It is.

00:25:18.723 --> 00:25:25.205
And that was something that I addressed with Jed, you know, as best as I could on when I sat down with her for an interview for a podcast.

00:25:25.267 --> 00:25:50.204
I'll link to the episode in the show notes so that if anybody didn't listen into that, they can go back and listen to it, because one of the things I really wanted to see if I could get some clarity from her on, was where would they be seeking providers of this GP education, and Ged made reference to a couple of existing providers that have received funding in the past that would perhaps be used again this time.

00:25:50.204 --> 00:26:00.266
The issue that I have with that and I spoke to Ged about this is, if we're using existing providers, can we unpack if that's actually been good education?

00:26:00.266 --> 00:26:01.147
Has it worked?

00:26:01.147 --> 00:26:20.606
Because, from my perspective, if we're sitting in this position now, where we know that there is a significant gap in education for GPs, that it hasn't worked and don't just hand out money to an existing provider because they've done it before, because we wouldn't be in this place if they'd done their job well in the first place.

00:26:21.295 --> 00:26:27.480
I think that's a really good point because it's that are you evaluating what currently exists and are you seeing what's working and what isn't working?

00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:34.964
And that's as someone who's been so embedded in this space for the last two and a half years and previously, from a personal perspective.

00:26:34.964 --> 00:26:43.500
My great frustration is how the hell did I get and I've spoken about this before how the hell did I get to 45 and have never heard the word perimenopause?

00:26:43.500 --> 00:26:57.182
Like, as someone who's worked in reproductive healthcare, whatever has been funded is not working if your incredibly health literate component of the population doesn't know anything about perimenopause and menopause.

00:26:57.182 --> 00:26:59.923
So you're going to have to try something new.

00:26:59.923 --> 00:27:02.944
You're going to have to look at what are the options out there.

00:27:02.944 --> 00:27:07.663
So the disappointing things about that 1.5 million, which, frankly, is simply not enough.

00:27:07.663 --> 00:27:11.336
But when you dig into it, it turns out it isn't actually really for GP education.

00:27:11.336 --> 00:27:15.005
It's for advertising GP education courses.

00:27:15.005 --> 00:27:18.358
It's not even developing new meaningful GP education.

00:27:18.358 --> 00:27:20.185
It's advertising courses.

00:27:20.326 --> 00:27:21.471
Now I listened.

00:27:21.471 --> 00:27:26.321
That podcast you did with Ged was fantastic and I loved it and I've shared it with lots of friends.

00:27:26.321 --> 00:27:38.415
But there was something in it where she said that some of that money would be going to tender, but then at Senate estimates.

00:27:38.415 --> 00:27:39.056
I think it was back in February.

00:27:39.056 --> 00:27:47.866
A question was asked at estimates about that money and where it would be going, and the Department of Health replied that it would be going to Jean Hailes and the Australasian Menopause Society, which indicates that it is not going to tender Jean Hailes and the Australasian Menopause Society which indicates that it is not going to tender.

00:27:47.886 --> 00:27:48.227
Yeah, and they are.

00:27:48.227 --> 00:28:00.763
Two previous existing providers that have received funding in the past are looking at receiving funding again, but the question needs to be asked, as you said is there an evaluation process in place?

00:28:00.784 --> 00:28:06.205
Yeah, I mean, if you actually look at the Jean Hailes funding, they've actually had $38 million over the last 10 years.

00:28:06.205 --> 00:28:12.419
Now, obviously that's for women's healthcare more broadly.

00:28:12.419 --> 00:28:13.682
They do brand themselves as leaders in the menopause space.

00:28:13.682 --> 00:28:20.561
So if they're the leaders in this space, how is that money being spent, how is it being evaluated and what are they delivering?

00:28:20.561 --> 00:28:26.891
Because, according to what we saw out of the Senate inquiry, gp knowledge absolutely dire.

00:28:26.891 --> 00:28:29.038
Community knowledge is absolutely dire.

00:28:29.038 --> 00:28:35.561
So maybe continuing to invest in the same old same old is not necessarily the best policy here and there's different ways you could do it.

00:28:35.561 --> 00:28:41.266
You could open it, have a tender, give it to 10 different players and after two years, evaluate which one's working the best.

00:28:41.266 --> 00:28:46.788
You know there are different ways of utilising new information and new modes of information.

00:28:46.788 --> 00:28:48.559
Like the world is changing so fast.

00:28:49.241 --> 00:28:50.526
Absolutely, you know.

00:28:50.526 --> 00:28:52.701
So we all got very excited.

00:28:52.701 --> 00:28:53.063
You know.

00:28:53.063 --> 00:28:56.234
$573 million is a lot of money.

00:28:56.234 --> 00:29:00.626
Everybody was referring to it as half a billion dollars, because that sounds even better.

00:29:00.626 --> 00:29:03.904
But let's dig into the detail.

00:29:03.904 --> 00:29:19.503
Let's get clear on what it all means and how it's going to be delivered, because those of us that have been working and advocating and lobbying for these things for so long need to make sure that the government is then trusted to get it right.

00:29:20.125 --> 00:29:32.730
Yeah, exactly, and I think that that is, you know, where the Department of Health said it was sort of a little bit like, well, who made that decision to A provide so little funding for GP education and B around where it was going to go.

00:29:32.730 --> 00:29:45.171
But on the plus because I'm always an optimist, sonya I see this as opening the door to a greater opportunity to design some really awesome, a bit like the community awareness campaign which has 12.8 million.

00:29:45.171 --> 00:29:51.683
So let's do something similar for medical education and let's look at a whole different you know raft of ways of meeting people where they're at.

00:29:51.683 --> 00:29:55.099
They don't necessarily have to travel to something like SoHot right now.

00:29:55.099 --> 00:30:04.082
Some of them might just want to be able to call a hotline and have a conversation, or some of them might not want to talk to another human and just do it all on a platform where people learn.

00:30:04.462 --> 00:30:08.089
So there are lots of options there none of, actually, which are that expensive.

00:30:08.089 --> 00:30:13.903
Like you know, I've looked at how much some of these different options cost and they're not going to break the bank.

00:30:14.816 --> 00:30:18.626
There are corporate organisations that roll out learning platforms.

00:30:18.626 --> 00:30:20.174
You know on a regular basis.

00:30:20.174 --> 00:30:23.760
Like the technology exists, you don't have to start from scratch.

00:30:23.760 --> 00:30:31.286
Find a model that works really well in a different industry and just translate that over into this healthcare industry.

00:30:31.946 --> 00:30:37.147
Yeah, no, I think great, I think that's you know, got that sorted there we go In the next couple of weeks.

00:30:37.147 --> 00:30:37.891
Thanks, government.

00:30:38.115 --> 00:30:38.878
You know where we are.

00:30:38.878 --> 00:30:40.183
We're full of great ideas.

00:30:40.183 --> 00:30:41.489
Reach out anytime.

00:30:41.489 --> 00:30:44.897
So, yes, there's our very short but robust conversation around.

00:30:44.897 --> 00:30:51.227
You know our concerns and our desires of how this GP education gap is filled.

00:30:51.448 --> 00:30:53.371
Okay, what else do we have?

00:30:53.371 --> 00:30:54.901
There's one other thing I wanted to talk about.

00:30:54.901 --> 00:31:05.877
Dr Lisa Mosconi has been awarded an incredible grant, so before we talk about that, I just want to say what's exciting about this is.

00:31:05.877 --> 00:31:13.022
I think it's really about how the land what we're seeing happen in Australia with the PBS is it's changing the landscape of what drugs are affordable.

00:31:13.022 --> 00:31:17.746
What it's going to mean for women to be able to access drugs that can enable them to this is the new frontier.

00:31:17.746 --> 00:31:35.163
Like, if we're going to really address the black hole of knowledge around some of the issues that impact the health of women, you're just going to have to come.

00:31:35.163 --> 00:31:37.824
We're just going to need some big, meaty grants.

00:31:37.824 --> 00:31:39.818
So how much is she getting?

00:31:40.019 --> 00:31:43.320
Sonia, my goodness, a couple of things I want to cover off here.

00:31:43.320 --> 00:31:59.510
So a non-profit Welcome Leap have announced a new $50 million research program to prevent 54.5 million Alzheimer's cases in women by 2050.

00:31:59.510 --> 00:32:13.285
So huge amount of money, huge goal, significant goal significant reduction in the number of Alzheimer's cases in women being prescribed each year, which is just amazing.

00:32:13.285 --> 00:32:23.441
But I thought that, before we jump into too much of that detail, it might be a good idea for anyone that's listening that doesn't know who Dr Lisa Mosconi is, to give them a little bit of insight into that.

00:32:23.441 --> 00:32:33.040
The fact that she's actually joining this whole research program as the program director.

00:32:33.040 --> 00:32:40.324
You know she's going to be absolutely involved at ground level as well as be driving all this research.

00:32:40.324 --> 00:32:41.247
So that's very, very cool.

00:32:41.247 --> 00:32:45.365
So Dr Lisa Mosconi is a neuroscientist.

00:32:45.365 --> 00:32:46.567
She's European.

00:32:46.567 --> 00:32:48.471
Am I right in saying she's Italian?

00:32:48.471 --> 00:32:59.183
Yeah, she's a neuroscientist who has done extraordinary work in, specifically, alzheimer's and dementia risk and prevention in women.

00:32:59.183 --> 00:33:02.723
Specifically, she published her first book last year, I think.

00:33:02.996 --> 00:33:13.484
Called the Menopause Brain and because she's the founder of the Alzheimer's Prevention Program and the Women's Brain Initiative at is it well, cornwall Medicine.

00:33:13.484 --> 00:33:14.701
Yeah, that's it.

00:33:14.701 --> 00:33:17.334
Yeah and um, she's.

00:33:17.334 --> 00:33:38.516
If you, if you google her, she's got some amazing, like a ted talk about the impacts, um, of estrogen on the brain, but in particular, she really talks about the intersection of oh god, it's very technical language like neuro endocrine risks and neuro generation and how that's going to impact brain health.

00:33:38.516 --> 00:33:42.255
But it's, it's really exciting and it's a really decent amount of money.

00:33:43.318 --> 00:33:44.763
Yeah, it's really exciting.

00:33:44.763 --> 00:34:04.923
One of the things that really jumped out at me and I think this is something that we really need to start demanding more of and pushing for more of from our government and from our healthcare system and from our research funds is that they're looking at the impact that this research will have on from a financial aspect, so the economic impacts, but also the health outcomes.

00:34:04.923 --> 00:34:18.681
So the thing that really jumped out to me was that, beyond improving health outcomes, cutting Alzheimer's risk in half could save the US alone 4.56 trillion US dollars.

00:34:18.681 --> 00:34:25.155
Holy cow, like that is a number, I literally can't even wrap my head around.

00:34:25.175 --> 00:34:26.197
And all for a mere 50 million.

00:34:27.121 --> 00:34:37.539
Yeah, exactly, we get caught in this conversation all the time and we've talked about it and vented about this before where there's just not enough research, not enough funding put into research.

00:34:37.539 --> 00:34:48.811
And we hear over and over again the response that gets wheeled out when we question why is there so much argument about using, let's say, testosterone therapy for women?

00:34:48.811 --> 00:34:54.791
And the answer is constantly because we don't have the research to prove it, nobody wants to fund it.

00:34:54.791 --> 00:35:12.514
We know that Professor Jayashri Kulkarni, who has done groundbreaking work on the mental health implications of perimenopause and menopause, has been trying so, so hard to get funding because everybody keeps saying to her well, until you do some research and you can actually prove this, we're not really going to take you seriously.

00:35:12.514 --> 00:35:22.715
There is just this bottleneck of getting these funds to the research programs so that we can stop wheeling out the well, we don't have the research wheelbarrow.

00:35:22.715 --> 00:35:31.849
So this just goes to show that $50 million investment is going to have an economic impact of potentially four points.

00:35:32.231 --> 00:35:36.440
Now, that's a return on investment that anyone would say is well worth doing.

00:35:36.840 --> 00:35:37.583
Thank, you very much.

00:35:38.893 --> 00:35:59.693
I know that we're about to have an election coming up and there's going to be a new term, but whoever wins the next election, let's go back to looking at a really big, decent, fast budget, to do some research, to address some of these big picture issues that could actually end up saving the Australian economy and the global economy trillions of dollars.

00:35:59.813 --> 00:36:08.516
Hey, look, spending on women long-term is absolutely beneficial for everyone, always a good return on investment, always a good return on investment.

00:36:08.516 --> 00:36:26.181
So the link to this I guess why we're talking about this is that there is a lot of research that's been done that does suggest that the loss of the neuroprotective sex hormones and that is predominantly estrogen may increase the risk of Alzheimer's post-menopausal.

00:36:26.181 --> 00:36:38.818
So that's where this announcement around this funding is going to have huge global implications and really for our perimenopausal and menopausal generations to start getting excited about.

00:36:39.260 --> 00:36:44.177
Yeah, and because that's what I think blew my mind when I first started reading about it was that it is.

00:36:44.177 --> 00:36:51.157
You know, alzheimer's doesn't appear until decades down the track, but basically it starts where we are now.

00:36:51.157 --> 00:36:52.221
It starts at midlife.

00:36:52.221 --> 00:36:58.277
So if you can nip it in the bud or reduce your chances now, then you know that's hugely impactful.

00:36:58.277 --> 00:37:03.643
And you know, one of the reasons I'm grateful I'm trying estrogen because, even though I'm not part of a clinical trial, I'll find out.

00:37:04.150 --> 00:37:05.777
Our own little personal experiments.

00:37:05.777 --> 00:37:19.222
Yeah, it's awesome and I think that you know Alzheimer's in particular and any of those cognitive decline diseases are so impactful on our communities.

00:37:19.222 --> 00:37:33.983
Not even if we take into account that economic impact, the impact that it has on families, on caregivers, on our health system, on our nurses this sector of the population that do get impacted by Alzheimer's and dementia is really significant.

00:37:33.983 --> 00:37:39.943
So anything that we can do to prevent that just has such big flow-on impacts.

00:37:40.829 --> 00:37:41.534
No, I agree.

00:37:41.534 --> 00:37:49.300
I agree, but they were calling for proposals from researchers from around the world, so it closed only a few days ago.

00:37:49.581 --> 00:37:49.922
Oh, it did.

00:37:49.922 --> 00:37:52.231
It closed on the 14th of March oh.

00:37:52.431 --> 00:37:54.458
I wonder if anyone from Australia has put in.

00:37:54.458 --> 00:38:02.878
So I'll look forward to seeing hopefully they'll announce at some point who have been awarded some of the grants to work on their free-made areas.

00:38:02.898 --> 00:38:03.478
To work on it.

00:38:03.818 --> 00:38:04.760
Yeah.

00:38:04.800 --> 00:38:05.762
Exciting time.

00:38:05.762 --> 00:38:11.340
Exciting time, all right, and I think I want us to finish up on a positive note.

00:38:11.340 --> 00:38:26.521
So, jo, talking about exciting times and I love having you here as my co-host on our Hot Takes your episode that we did dare menopause episode where I interviewed you about your experience and what brought you into this space hugely popular people love it.

00:38:26.521 --> 00:38:27.592
They love hearing your story.

00:38:27.592 --> 00:38:35.030
Can you share with us where you're at right now from a um, you know, a personal career perspective?

00:38:35.891 --> 00:38:36.791
yes, okay, great.

00:38:36.791 --> 00:38:39.653
So I haven't actually done a formal you know launch yet.

00:38:39.653 --> 00:39:10.898
But yes, I've got my own consulting business now and it's called Sheela Unapologetic Advocacy and I am going to be working with organisations, businesses, not-for-profits around their advocacy goals and providing support to help shape how they want to put together their arguments probably predominantly to government around what they'd like to see on the policy agenda and, I guess, continue making a lot of loud noise about issues that are passionate to me.

00:39:10.898 --> 00:39:28.090
I think over the last few years there might have been a few in the sector who've tried to use the word lobbyist in relation to what I do, and I've had to grapple with that because you know I do find the word lobbyist it does for some reason it has really negative connotations of well people doing evil things for money.

00:39:29.313 --> 00:39:36.114
But if I am going to do this, I am going to have to register on the Australian um lobbyist register with the government.

00:39:36.114 --> 00:39:37.817
But I'm reframing it.

00:39:37.817 --> 00:39:38.798
I'm still an advocate.

00:39:38.798 --> 00:39:47.585
I still advocacy is what I do and advocacy to me is about working on something that you passionately believe in.

00:39:47.585 --> 00:39:56.001
So you know, my partner's joked and he's like, yeah, you could go and get a job like working for an oil company, and then he's giggled because he knows that's never going to happen.

00:39:56.001 --> 00:40:05.394
I am going to be hopefully doing some really cool things with some really cool entities and organizations and people.

00:40:06.436 --> 00:40:06.938
Amazing.

00:40:06.938 --> 00:40:10.592
I'm so proud of you and I am so excited for where this goes.

00:40:10.592 --> 00:40:13.523
I'm very excited for you to be shaking up the lobbyist world.

00:40:14.065 --> 00:40:18.117
And you know, the other thing is I've had a few people say, oh, sheila, that name.

00:40:18.117 --> 00:40:20.922
It's like I'm not a fan.

00:40:22.170 --> 00:40:34.338
But you know, for me it's all about being authentic and very on brand for me, but you do have a website that we can share in the show notes.

00:40:34.338 --> 00:40:37.003
Oh, linkedin, okay cool.

00:40:37.003 --> 00:40:46.132
We'll share your LinkedIn profile and anybody that is listening and that would like to know more about what you're up to and, perhaps, potentially, how they could work with you.

00:40:46.132 --> 00:40:47.556
They can reach out to you on LinkedIn.

00:40:47.556 --> 00:40:49.300
Awesome, jo.

00:40:49.300 --> 00:40:50.523
Thank you so much.

00:40:50.523 --> 00:41:02.400
As always, it's great to sit here and have these robust conversations and start putting out ideas for people to think about and not just being super negative, but not also being super shiny.

00:41:02.400 --> 00:41:05.175
Positive all the time, like this is the reality of what's going on.

00:41:05.677 --> 00:41:10.775
Yeah, I know, and it feels like we are in a very exciting period, so hopefully we will chat again.

00:41:10.775 --> 00:41:16.596
The election still hasn't been called, so there's time for more amazing things and announcements to happen.

00:41:16.596 --> 00:41:19.119
It's like every morning you're waking up and it's Christmas morning.

00:41:21.289 --> 00:41:21.931
What's going to happen?

00:41:21.931 --> 00:41:23.817
It's like every morning you're waking up and it's Christmas morning.

00:41:23.817 --> 00:41:24.318
What's going to happen?

00:41:24.318 --> 00:41:25.161
What's going to be in the news today?

00:41:25.161 --> 00:41:25.561
It does.

00:41:25.561 --> 00:41:28.309
It is literally the gift that keeps on giving right now.

00:41:28.309 --> 00:41:28.650
Long may it last.